Skip to main content
11542
Kourgiantakis, Toula; Markoulakis, Roula; Lee, Eunjung; Hussain, Amina; Lau, Carrie; Ashcroft, Rachelle; Goldstein, Abby L.; Kodeeswaran, Sugy; Williams, Charmaine C.; Levitt, Anthony
2023
Access to mental health and addiction services for youth and their families in Ontario: perspectives of parents, youth, and service providers.
Background
Canadian youth (aged 16–24) have the highest rates of mental health and addiction concerns across all age groups and the most unmet health care needs. There are many structural barriers that contribute to the unmet mental health care needs of youth including lack of available and appropriate services, high costs, long wait times, fragmented and siloed services, lack of smooth transition between child and adult services, stigma, racism, and discrimination, as well as lack of culturally appropriate treatments. Levesque et al. (2013) developed a framework to better understand health care access and this framework conceptualizes accessibility across five dimensions: (1) approachability, (2) availability, (3) affordability, (4) appropriateness, and (5) acceptability. The purpose of this study was to explore access to addiction and mental health services for youth in Ontario, Canada from the perspectives of youth, parents, and service providers.

Methods
This qualitative study was a university-community partnership exploring the experiences of youth with mental health concerns and their families from the perspectives of youth, caregivers, and service providers. We conducted semi-structured interviews and used thematic analysis to analyze data.

Results
The study involved 25 participants (n?=?11 parents, n?=?4 youth, n?=?10 service providers). We identified six themes related to structural barriers impacting access to youth mental health and services: (1) “The biggest barrier in accessing mental health support is where to look,” (2) “There’s always going to be a waitlist,” (3) “I have to have money to be healthy,” (4) “They weren’t really listening to my issues,” (5) “Having more of a welcoming and inclusive system,” and (6) “Health laws aren’t doing what they need to do.”

Conclusion
Our study identified five structural barriers that map onto the Levesque et al. healthcare access conceptual framework and a sixth structural barrier that is not adequately captured by this model which focuses on policies, procedures, and laws. The findings have implications for policies and service provisions, and underline the urgent need for a mental health strategy that will increase access to care, improve mental health in youth, decrease burden on parents, and reduce inequities in mental health policies and services.
International Journal of Mental Health Systems
17
10.1186/s13033-023-00572-z
Service Delivery/Access
Health Worker-Unspecified, Stakeholders-Patients
Community Care, Hospitals/Tertiary Care, Mental Health and Substance Use Health, Multi, Private Care Sector
Interview/Focus Group, Qualitative Methods
Toula Kourgiantakis
Canada
Canada-Ontario
Journal Article
Published Literature
English